The India-Pakistan conflict has increased the risk of nuclear weapons being used, according to a former Islamabad official and military researchers.
In a
swiftly escalating
Clashes between the two nuclear-armed nations resulted in at least 26 fatalities due to Indian aerial attacks on Wednesday, according to Pakistani authorities who stated they had brought down five Indian warplanes.
India’s “Operation Sindoor” was conducted as a reaction to a militant assault that took place.
killed 26, mostly tourists
in Indian-controlled Kashmir last month, for which New Delhi holds Pakistan responsible. Pakistan denies involvement.
India reported that 15 of its nationals lost their lives due to shelling from Pakistan across the Line of Control (LOC), which serves as the de facto boundary for the contested Kashmir area claimed by both nations. It was also stated that five individuals from Pakistan died during this incident.
Islamabad announced on Wednesday that its
military had been authorised
To “take appropriate measures” in order to “avange the loss of innocent Pakistani lives and the clear infringement of its sovereignty.”
According to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, both India and Pakistan possess over 160 nuclear warheads each, making them nuclear-armed nations.
While India maintains a no-first-use nuclear policy, it said in 2019 that it was reconsidering this. Although Pakistan has not declared such a policy, it has emphasised the possible use of battlefields of “tactical” nuclear weapons as a means to counter India’s larger conventional forces.
Raoof Hasan, who served as special assistant to the former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, accused India of a reckless act that could lead to uncontrolled escalation between the nuclear-armed rivals.
“When a larger and stronger nation assaults a smaller nation possessing nuclear arms, you’re essentially inciting the possibility of these weapons being used,” he stated.
The i Paper
. “I hope and pray that it does not escalate beyond control.”
Mr. Hasan charged India with engaging in a reckless action that had the potential to cause an uncontrollable increase in tensions between the two nuclear-powered adversaries.
Hasan, who currently heads the policy research division for the opposing PTI party, mentioned that unorthodox forces play a role in Pakistan’s strategy for dealing with conflicts.
When possessing the bomb, it’s impossible to entirely remove it from your thoughts and strategic framework… India possesses the bomb. We possess the bomb as well. Furthermore, we’ve test-fired two missiles in the past week. One missile can travel up to 450 kilometers and is equipped to carry nuclear warheads.
Read Next:
“We have abandoned everything”: Kashmir unrest triggers retaliatory strikes throughout India
The nuclear framework has already been challenged by India,” he said additionally. “India has undertaken a deliberate gamble, or at least I hope it is deliberate, considering Pakistan’s reaction.
Pakistan-based scientists caution that India’s deployment of its superior regular army might prompt an irregular reaction should military strategists perceive an imminent existential danger.
Anam Murad Khan, a researcher at the Center for International Strategic Studies, a think-tank in Islamabad, wrote that Pakistan could resort to extreme measures in response to India’s aggressive military posture, citing the Cold Start doctrine (CSD), which calls for rapid conquest of Pakistani territory in the event of a major conflict.
“The presence of kinetic strategies in the CSD compelled Pakistan to maintain a credible nuclear deterrence to prevent any military intervention by the belligerent army that is twice its size,” Khan
wrote in an article
published on Wednesday.
It is risky to entertain such military intervention strategies in India while the opposing nation, Pakistan, views nuclear weapons as the sole defense against existential threats. This situation could lead to lowering the nuclear threshold.
According to the report, India has a significant edge in terms of personnel numbers, combat planes, and armored vehicles.
Global Firepower index
.
Separate nuclear experts have likewise voiced worries about the shooting incidents between these nuclear-armed nations.
“Given that each side has over 160 nuclear weapons, the possibility of increased tensions poses significant dangers,” stated Dr. Hans Kristensen, who leads the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, in a social media update.
Dr. Kristensen was a co-author of the research study from 2019.
What Could Trigger a Nuclear War Between India and Pakistan?
which examines a situation where “Pakistani generals become panicked and conclude that the sole means of thwarting an assault by the more powerful Indian troops is through the use of nuclear arms.”
Pravin Sawhney, a former Indian Army officer and the editor of a military news platform,
Force India,
indicated that each side could point to achievements from Wednesday’s interaction and neither had crossed into the other’s domain, paving the way for potential easing of tensions.
Read Next:
Is it safe to travel to India and Pakistan and are flights cancelled?
But India’s strikes failed to achieve deterrence, he added, which could lead to further clashes.
“Pakistan does not seem intimidated, therefore I anticipate additional assaults in Jammu and Kashmir over the next few days,” he stated.
Arsla Jawaid, an associate director and regional specialist at the Control Risks consultancy, indicated that de-escalation might prove difficult due to the greater magnitude of this confrontation compared to numerous past border incidents. She highlighted factors such as “the targeting of civilian areas” and “the shooting down of several Indian combat aircraft.”
She thinks Pakistan’s reaction to the Indian attacks will probably be robust.
“Despite global appeals and initiatives aimed at promoting restraint and reducing tensions, the potential for escalation remains significant,” stated Jawaid.
However, she mentioned that each side possessed various capabilities and options for increasing tensions without resorting to nuclear arms.
Both nuclear-armed adversaries possess extensive strategies and capabilities for traditional combat and military power, which they can utilize without needing to employ their nuclear arsenals… The presence of nuclear weapons on both sides will serve as a significant deterrence if the security environment becomes more precarious.
